There are a limited number of elevator companies in Australia capable of delivering at scale, and choosing between them is one of the few procurement decisions on a build that keeps costing or saving money long after practical completion. Worth spending an afternoon on rather than an hour.

Here is the part that gets underweighted at tender. You are not buying an installation. You are entering a relationship that outlasts almost everyone who will sign the contract.

The company that installs your lifts will very likely maintain them. Their components will sit in your shaft for two decades. When something fails in year twelve, their parts availability is your parts availability. When you come to modernise in year twenty, whether that is a staged upgrade or a full replacement often comes down to decisions made in the original specification.

Which reframes the question. Not who is cheapest to install, but who will still be a good answer in 2050.

On a construction project, a lift running late is rarely a lift problem. It is a handover problem, an occupancy certificate problem and a rent problem.

Ask for delivery performance on comparable Australian projects, not a global average. Ask who project manages, whether that person is local, and how many concurrent projects they carry. Ask about installation methodology, because it affects your programme directly. Scaffoldless in-shaft installation and construction time use arrangements can free the shaft earlier and let you strip external hoists sooner. Our elevator installation process page sets out how that sequence works in practice.

The follow-up question matters more than the first: what happens when they slip? A supplier who can describe their recovery process has one. A supplier who says it will not happen is telling you something else.

This separates suppliers more than anything else on the list, and it is the criterion most buyers skip. Every supplier can price the lifts you asked for. The better ones tell you when you have asked for the wrong lifts. A capable supplier models how people will actually move through your building, at peak, in the pattern your building type generates. Then comes back with a different answer if the numbers do not work.

That conversation is worth having before the cores are drawn, not after. Waiting times, car sizes and shaft positions are cheap to change on a drawing and expensive to change in concrete. Our people flow planning and consulting team does that modelling, and it is a fair thing to ask of anyone tendering.

Ask for it directly, and ask for the numbers the supplier did not choose.

Installation is one of the highest-risk phases in the life of a lift, and it happens on your site, under your principal contractor's safety framework. A supplier's incident history, their approach to working at height in the shaft, and how they induct and supervise their own crews all become your exposure the moment they arrive.

A company that treats this as a routine question and answers it with data is showing you how it operates. Vagueness here is not modesty.

A national brand means nothing if the nearest technician is four hours away.

Ask where their branches actually are relative to your building, how many technicians work out of that branch, and whether the installation crew and the service crew are the same organisation or a subcontract chain. Then ask what their response commitment is once the defects period ends, because that is the number you live with.

For context on our own footprint, our branch offices are listed by location across Australia and New Zealand.

The quiet one, and the one that costs the most when it goes wrong.

Lift controllers are the component that ages fastest, not because they wear out but because they become obsolete. Ask how long the supplier commits to parts availability for the equipment they are proposing. Ask whether the controller is proprietary, and what that means if you ever want a different company to service the lift. Ask what a modernisation looks like on this equipment in twenty years, and whether it can be staged or whether the whole thing comes out.

You will not get precise answers to all of that. You will learn a great deal from how readily each supplier engages with the question.

It is also worth asking what happens to equipment when a supplier changes hands, because the Australian market consolidates. Our own network has grown that way, through the acquisition of Orbitz Elevators and later the FUJI Elevators asset acquisition, which brought both customers and technicians across. For a buyer, the useful question is whether the company you pick will still be servicing your building in fifteen years under some name, and who picks it up if not.

Worth putting in writing rather than raising in a meeting:

• What is your on-time delivery record on Australian projects of this size?
• Who is the project manager, where are they based, and how many other jobs do they have?
• Will you review our lift schedule independently and tell us if it is wrong?
• What is your incident rate, and how do you calculate it?
• Which branch services this building and how many technicians work there?
• How long will parts be available, and is the controller proprietary?
• What does modernisation look like on this equipment in twenty years?

Most elevator companies will look broadly similar on a tender summary sheet. Price and programme will always do most of the work in that evaluation, and reasonably so. The point is not to ignore them. It is to weigh them against the things that only become visible later, when the scaffolding is long gone, and someone is trying to source a controller board.

If you are working through a supplier shortlist now, there is background on our history, footprint and how we operate in about KONE in Australia. Worth reading alongside the same information from everyone else you are considering.

empty